Put one HR process on paper before you automate it.
Most process problems stay vague until somebody draws the handoffs. This worksheet helps name the job, the owner, the human boundary, and the smallest test worth running.
Manager intake, a weekly HRBP brief, policy-question routing, or compliance follow-through are easier to test than a grand promise to transform HR. Do not put employee names, case details, or sensitive information here.
Nothing you type on this page is submitted or saved by the site. Print or save it as a PDF if you want to keep it.
AI in HR workflow review
One process. Four questions. One small test.
Process
Date
Responsible person or role
01
What is the actual problem?
Describe what keeps happening. Skip the proposed tool for a minute.
02
Who has to decide?
A useful workflow supports the person responsible for the call. It does not hide them.
03
What would make this useful?
Name the meeting, decision, document, or task that should become easier.
04
How will we know it works?
Use realistic examples. Include the annoying edge case. The clean one will flatter the design.
The smallest honest test
Keep the test small. Start with the weak handoff.
Worked example
What this looked like in HR Mission Control.
Finding a compliance update was only the first step. The operational problem was turning it into reviewed, owned, completed work without pretending the tool knew what the law meant for a company.
Actual problem
A relevant update can be found and still never become completed work.
Decision owner
A named person reviews the source, decides what it means, and owns the next step.
Useful output
A source-linked review packet with the missing facts, owner, and follow-through together.
Failure worth testing
A source changed its title. The first design treated the same issue as new, so the identity logic had to change.
Human boundary
The prototype organizes evidence and work. It does not give legal advice, make policy decisions, or decide an employment outcome.
A workflow review traces the real work, marks what stays human, and chooses one sensible change. We can leave the tool out of it if the process is the problem.
